ANOTHER WORLD:

A Biblio-Critical Study of Speculative Fiction Novels



Chapter 08 Frankenstein Unbound: Brian Aldiss

 

Links to other sites on the Web:
(for links to other chapters go to the end of the file)
Back to Chapter 9
Forward to Chapter 7
Back to the Academic Page
Back to Fruit Home





Chapter Eight: Frankenstein Unbound,
Brian Aldiss



A. Introduction: Straddling Worlds


Brian Aldiss ranks as one of the most literate and consistently entertaining writers of speculative fiction. Although occasionally Aldiss's fiction varies towards the dark and satirical, his novels usually posses and underlying humor and verve. Aldiss, like Alfred Bester before him, uses standard science fiction for very nonstandard purposes.

Brian Aldiss (1925-), born in England, received his education in through private schools. He served in the Royal Signal Corps in Burma during World War II, which forms the locale for two of his novels and seems to have shaped some of his attitudes towards colonialism. He demobilized in 1948 and became an assistant in an Oxford bookshop. He began writing by contributing sketches about bookselling to The Bookseller, eventually collected in The Brightfoot Diaries. He sold his first story to Ted Carnell's Science Fantasy but achieved his first major success with Starship (1958), a novel.

Aldiss found in science fiction a form congenital to his vision, which on the surface does not seemingly vary much from that of his compatriot Ballard:

"I am a surrealist at heart; that is I'm none too sure whether the reality of the world agrees with its appearances. Only in sf, or near sf, can you express these feelings in word." (1)

Aldiss's story-lines do not much vary from Cambpellian or, more to the point, Carnellian science fiction. The character discovers he does not know all he needs to know about the world. He seeks the truth, and in classic science fiction apparently finds it. Aldiss's vision of the world, however, differs radically from the typical Carnellian science fiction writer's. The individual image and character, rather than the plot, more interests Aldiss:

"There are two methods of writing. One that almost always wins in the heritage of the pulp magazine where what you really have is plot...Another method is to think of some scenes that are going to be telling something that the reader will remember, and you've got to have people who are in some way memorable...I prefer the second method; it's the method I work on." (2)

Aldiss helped bring mainstream literary techniques into science fiction. Metaphors, similes, and occasionally overwrought prose abound in Aldiss's style. Aldiss's humor and puns balance this and usually prevent overloading the novel with too much message or too much purple prose. In his middle period, Aldiss, like Ballard, flirted with surrealism, stream of consciousness, and even poetry, but recent novels stick more to traditional methods verging on pulp nostalgia. Critic James Blish, generally antagonistic towards stylistic experimentation in science fiction, praises Aldiss's efforts and adds that Aldiss "never offers aborted experiments in the disguise of finished works." (3)

Escape and escapism persistently reappear in Aldiss's fiction. Knowledge allows freedom from a particular mind set. Avoiding the truth imprisons one. The higher truth may frighten, but gives greater psychological and physical satisfaction:

"The idea of people imprisoned by circumstances has been one of my themes..I don't regard myself as imprisoned by circumstances, but I think I did as a kid...I have always had a sense of having escaped slavery. I spent ten years in the bookstores...Even before that, I had escaped from my father's loathsome gentleman’s outfitters establishment, and...from my uncle's architecture firm." (4)

Aldiss’s persistent critique of Western society forms a second important theme in his work. Aldiss attacks the imperialistic view but also finds isolationism equally sterile. His novels voice these concerns and something of a left-wing political stance:

"I think science fiction should be subversive, it shouldn’t be in the game of consolations, it should shake people up. It should question things..In my more maniac moods, I still carry that early banner: Science fiction should tell you things you don't want to know." (5)

Destruction and the death of society and the world form another recurring motif in Aldiss's novels as they do of his British New World contemporaries, Ballard and Moorcock. Manmade catastrophes and failures Aldiss censures, but he finds a romantic satisfaction in the natural replacement and demise of humanity unique among speculative fiction writers, and unlike Ballard, these processes appear positive and not bizarre. Like the romantic writers, Aldiss can identify with nature even as it destroys his fellow men.

Aldiss produces realistic characters. His men, petty, small, and often stupid, occasionally blunder into triumphs, which surprise them as much as they do the reader. The protagonists, generally anti-heroes, find that making humanity's place in the universe or even their own in society lies beyond their capability; the narrator or some wise futuristic character must give them the information or insight. Aldiss forces today's men, ready or not, to face tomorrow, and the future provides a metaphor for the new vision that both reader and character must face today.

Whereas another more traditional science writer might consciously create a situation that might functions as a metaphor to reader, Aldiss consciously uses his science fiction as metaphor:

"You can evade a lot of pretentiousness by using metaphor in science fiction. A lot of science fiction is metaphor; you can put up a grand picture, as it were, without being pretentious. You give the reader a chance to interpret the picture in his own way. The thing I like about science fiction is that science fiction is not myopic. It does try to see things in a wide-screen way." (6)

This use of science fiction as metaphor, when properly controlled, serves Aldiss well. Unfortunately, this use as science fiction as metaphor sometimes brings Aldiss's own lack of scientific background to the fore and causes some confusion. Whereas it would appall a classic science fiction writer to find his world "does not work," Aldiss will and does readily put aside natural laws in search of creating meaning. Whereas one can forgive a Ballard for the world logic of his worlds as they stem as projections of the unconscious or even Dick, who in a work such as Ubik or the Zap Gun mocks the silliness of his own sciences, Aldiss’s science sometimes seems "almost workable" to the work’s detriment. Thus, whereas Blish attacks Zealzny for not choosing between allegory and realism in works like Creatures of Light and Darkness, Aldiss consistently chooses symbolism over realism, but his resisting readers and critics simply do not always agree with his choice. Here his own ability to create realistic characters, in which he surpasses Zelazny, Dick, or Ballard, tends to works against him. The action seems too realistic to take as merely metaphoric.

Another point distinguishes Aldiss from colleagues, the English in particular, his relative optimism. Often, perhaps a bit too often, Aldiss’s works end on a positive note even when all humanity perishes. Personally, he expresses a similar optimism about the profession and about traditional science fiction an optomism expressed by both his long history and somewhat affectionate parodies of the genre. Here, as in his fiction, Aldiss often seems particularly capable of straddling the lines, between realism and metaphor, experiment and tradition, attack and defense, and mainstream and pulp.

 



B. The Short stories and Two Pseudo Novels


Aldiss wrote in a variety of different genres. His Billion Year Spree: A true History of Science Fiction, quoted numerous times in previous chapters, ranks as one of the classics of science fiction criticism. He edited anthologies too numerous to mention, from the innovative SF series co-edited with Harry Harrison to Farewell Fantastic Venus and Space Opera, nostalgic collections of old space operas.

Two novels about the growth of a young man in Burma during the 1940s, the Hand-Reared Boy (1970) and A Soldier Erect (1971), their titles giving clues as to their sexual content and humor, drew mixed reviews from mainstream critics (7). Another non-science fiction work, Brothers of the Head, (1977) concerns a pair of Siamese twins.

Short stories, one of Aldiss's strength, appear in several collections: No Time Like tomorrow (1959, out of print); Who Can Replace a Man (1965); The Saliva Tree and Other Strange Growths (1966); Neanderthal Planet (1969); Moment of Eclipse (1970--currently out of print); The Book of Brian Aldiss (1972--out of print);, and New Arrivals and Old Encounters (1980). Two volumes straddle the lien between science fiction stories and novels with an intrusive, didactic authorial voice. They also show his penchant for using science fiction as metaphor.

Starswarm (1965) Aldiss organizes around different colored segment of a galaxy that humanity inhabits one million years from now, and it posits that "the inhabited solar system of Starswarm--our galaxy--will exhibit all the characteristics through which a civilization can pass." (8) In its first story, "Sector Vermilion," a plant of men attempt to escape an Oedipal relationship with their wife-mother figures. The finale, "The Rift," tells the story of an alien that learns about humanity by transforming herself into one of its art-works.

Galaxies Like Grains of Sand (1959) attempts to give glimpses of mankind's history. A "Visting Amoebae" comes to take supplant mankind, but he gives men a consolation, typically Aldissian, for their children:

"'Explain to them once more that there are galaxies like grains of sand, each galaxy a cosmic laboratory for bold experiments of nature...and that a newer one, with more modern equipment, is opening just down the street.'" (9)

These two segmented novels suffer from over didacticism, intrusive narration, and an occasional tendency for the omniscient narrator to find more meaning in a story than the reader might. They illustrate, however, Aldiss's skill as a story a writer. His stories tend to have more of the fantastic and more irony of the situation, despite having worse character development than his novels.


 


C. The Early Novels and The Long Afternoon of Earth


Aldiss's novels fall into three periods. The first lasts from 1958 to approximately 1961. These novels feature standard science fiction plotting and style but contain better characterization and original themes than those of Aldiss's mainstream contemporaries.

Starship (1958) takes the traditional story of the broken down civilization living in a generations' starship first used in Robert A. Heinlein's Orphans in the Sky (1940). In Heinlein's story, the strongest learn their predicament and figure their way out. In Starship, Aldiss's weak hero discovers the ship already returned from its destination and orbits earth. The characters, petty, confused, and even silly cannot do much. Roy Complain, aptly named, becomes the reluctant protagonist and learns, to his surprise, that he traces his ancestry back to the original captain of the ship. A salvage party from earth reveals to him and his fellow shipmates the message of the novel's prologue:

"A community that cannot or will not realize it is an insignificant a part of the universe it occupies is not truly civilized. That is to say, it contains a fatal ingredient which renders it, to whatever extent, unbalanced." (10)

The shipmates must learn to live as part of a new larger community of earth. Aldiss's decision to give his travelers biological as well as social reasons for misunderstanding their fellow humans weakens the novel. The situation, as Aldiss well knows, does not offer any originality either. A competent first novel, Starship humanizes the old Asimovian-Heinleinian hard science novel.

None of Aldiss's other early novels remain in print, but they continue in a similar vein. Vanguad from Alpha (1959) received some mixed praise from critic Damon Knight who, implicitly acknowledging some of Aldiss’s limitations as consistent world creator said its "final solution is ingenious and satisfying; his future world has at least touched on reality because it's as idiotically patched together as our own." (11) Bow Down to Null (1960) introduces a Galactic Empire along the lines of Asimov, but Aldiss's decays and corrupts, a clear recreation of the late British Empire. Simple interpreter Gary Towler ends up leading the revolution that clears the "nulls" from the earth. The Primal Urge (1961), a funny ironic taboo-breaking novel, points toward the sexual concerns of a later generation. It asks, which comes first: sex or power, passion or reason, body or soul? (12) These three novels, like Starship offer original variations on old themes, but they lack the technical skill of later Aldiss works.

The Long Afternoon of Earth (serialized in FASF, 60-61, 1962) won the Hugo award for short fiction and incorporates Aldiss's most fantastic setting, one of his few truly original ones. In the novel, the earth has stopped revolving; one side nearly lacks all life, and the other spawns a new spectrum of exotic plant life that chokes out most of the animal species. Man survives in a reduced, life-shortened form. Some evolve into a butterfly like form; the "tummy-belly men" develop umbilical chords that allow them to act as mental and physical dependents of the tummy-belly trees. Humans on the dark side devolve into near apes. James Blish justly criticizes the physical and biological characteristics of this world. (13)

Gren, a human, performs a mock epic journey across this world; a morel, an intelligent mold creature, enslaves him. He encounters a dolphin-evolved Soda, who keeps humans for slaves. His morel captor takes over the mind of the Sodel and reveals the purpose of the solar system to Gren:

"Very long ago, your remote ancestors discovered that life grew and evolved from, as it were, a speck of fertility...What the Sodals discovered is that growth incorporates what men would call decay. That not only does nature have to be wound up to wind down. Again, the forms are blurring! They never ceased to by anything but inter-dependent-the one always living off the other-and now they merge together once more." (14)

When the morel offers to take the humans to the stars on the backs of starspiders, he impresses Gren, but then he adds he wants to create a new civilization with morels as rulers, Gren becomes less impressed. He accepts, instead, the natural demise of mankind as he does man's limitations:

"I'm tired of carrying or being carried. Go and good luck...Fill a whole empty world with people and fungus...Come on," he said encouragingly (to his mate) "this (the earth) shall be home, where danger was my cradle, and all we have learned will guard us!" (15)

Gren learns how to live freely by experiencing physical, mental, and emotional slavery. He learns to lead by undergoing domination. If impossible, Hothouse offers an amusing, intriguing world. The Long Afternoon of Earth, an engaging, entertaining composition with an underlying statement about a man's place in the universe though suffers somewhat from Aldiss's scientifically implausible situation.


 


D. Classical Aldiss: the Mid 1960s novels, The Dark Light Years;
Greybeard, Earthworks,
and Cryptozoic!


His second period dates from 1962-1970. Significantly, his first work of this period, Report on Probability A, did not find its way into print until 1968. During the intervening years, Aldiss became closely associated with New Worlds, even to the point of securing a grant from National Council of the Arts when it appeared the magazine would fold. New Worlds gave Aldiss a market for the experimental, darker path of his second period. Aldiss, in return, provided Moorcock's group with something of the respectability they otherwise lacked. This period, partly due to this relationship, contains most of Aldiss's best novels.

The Dark Light-Years (1964) as the title suggests, contains dark humor, more specifically Aldiss's Swiftian satire. In the book, Humanity encounters the Utods, a species that eats, excretes, and copulates from a single orifice. Ambisexual, telepathic, and nearly immune from pain, the Utods inhabit filthy Shangrilas. They neither fight wars, suffer diseases, hate one another, nor even feel normal pain. Some Utods, however, violate the isolationist tenets of their religion to travel to the stars where they encounter human spacemen. The Utod's physical structure prevents them from developing an intellectual personality separate from their emotional personality. Mankind holds the ambiguous advantage of viewing life from a detached, objective standpoint. Aldiss, however, makes it clear the Utods hold the capacity to destroy humanity any time they wish.

The human attributes the Utods passivity to inferiority. Seeing the Utods living in their own excrement re-enforces this conclusion. They rapidly exterminate almost all of the Utods, whom they consider near animals. At least one surviving Utod, however, appears destined to return the "wisdom" that humanity’s violence imparted:

"The younger (Utod) moved into the deserted building. He examined the armory. The soldiers had left it untouched, as directed by the one who had spoken about the deaths of so many Utods. Satisfied, he turned back and walked without pause through the gate of the stockade. He had remained patiently captive (to the humans) for a small fraction of his life. Now, it was time to think about freedom.

"Time, too, that the rest of his brothers thought about freedom." (16)

The Utods suffer the sin of ignorance, but mankind from its inhumanity. The novel frightens with only a few kind characters to alleviate its dire vision. Some of Aldiss's humor could have balanced a work over-laden with grim irony. If Jonathan Smith wrote science fiction, he might have written The Dark-Light Years.

Graybeard (1965) features a novel in which no one bears children any more. Greybeard and Martha search and find children still being born, insuring man's survival. Throughout, Aldiss criticizes modern society, particularly its potential for nuclear destruction. The novel repeats Aldiss's concern with the cycle of nature. It also remains out of print, despite some critical acclaim. (17)

Earthworks (1965) also contains social themes. It employs cinematic "cuts" to show the difficulty of distinguishing illusion and reality. The world of Earthworks suffers from soil depletion and famine. Characters live, nearly alone, on board an automated spaceship. Hostile to each other, they live out of touch with their environment. The narrator and journalist are bound by name, knowledge, and job. Most critics regard this as a minor effort (18), but Paul Ableman rates the novel highly and states that "he succeeds in wedding the psychological and metaphysical realities in a convincing and compelling narrative structure." (19)

Cryptozoic! (1967) concerns artistic and social escapism. Edmund Bush, an artist, mind-travels back in time in order to get ideas for his paintings. Most productive people in the year 2093, the setting of the novel, escape in a similar fashion from militaristic governments, social unrest, and continuing third world poverty. Bush's own father and stepmother provide him with no moral and ethical guidance. In the far-future, Cryptozoic, however, Bush discovers that time actually moves backwards; mankind devolves towards the amoebae stage. This provides a convenient explanation for many seeming contradictions in his own world as well as a metaphor for the decaying society he inhabits:

"Now look at all as it really was...They would all grow younger...Joan, we presume, would sink into happy babyhood and finally be taken into her mother, who would grow young and fair again. There'd be no tragedy and much less distress." (20)

Bush believes this, but a psychiatrist offers an alternative explanation to his father: Bush's mind simply no longer accepts the real world. The social and psychological problems of the world may weigh too much on Bush, and Aldiss does not tell us which theory to believe, leaving us free also to choose the more escapist solution. The reader, he suggests, can look at his own decaying society or escape-into science fiction. Cryptozoic an amusing, well-written novel about social ills parodies the very reasons the reader chose to read it in the first place.


 


E. The Experimental Fiction of Report on Probability A
and Barefoot in the Head


Report on Probability-A (1968) shows the influence of the French anti-novel. Mr. and Mrs. Mary have dismiss their servant G, who watches them, while S and C watch G, who in turn are being watched. The cycle of observers forms a complete circle when Mrs. Mary turns on her television.

"Sitting quietly in her own room the fingertips of one hand resting in her tawny hair, Mr. Mary's wife sat in her own room and regarded the cycle of universes as night closed in." (21)

None find fulfillment except by watch the others. They lack the personal participation which makes men alive. Like the painting, they lack the ability to interpret; they cannot every attain any human objectives. They can do nothing any more except watch:

"Forgetting his flock, the youth (in his painting) leant forward so that her sturdy form touched his chest and arms. As she half-turned, his hair was against her cheek. He could smell the warmth of it and the scents of her body, which the sunny day released.

"Nobody was near. The sheep could take of themselves within his imprisoning hand, he could feel the doomed moth flutter. Her hand was raised toward it in a gesture of indecision.

"He waited.

"She waited." (22)

The people of Western society, the novels asserts, settle for the illusion of life rather than really living. Appropriately, Aldiss wrote the book in a totally objective style. A Report on Probability A, offers an intriguing, funny comment on a society fallen in love with the image.

Barefoot in the Head (1969) probably rates as Aldiss's finest novel and certainly speculative fiction's best excursion into the murky waters of stream-of-consciousness. Colin Charteris travels through a Europe recently "bombed" with psychedelic narcotics. He becomes a guru but gives no reasonable message for his followers; he embraces total randomness. His followers, however, need some order, so they crucify him in a grotesque parody of the Christ myth. From his cross, Colin laments one cannot reap the benefits of leading society without contributing to its mental well-being:

"Their dull, conformist minds he would have to give them holy law okay but spiced with heresy let them grit it right up their nostrils.

Ultimately he said.

At least they would always hold him immobile in their eyes not exactly the posture he had once aimed for but only fair he had tried genuinely tried.

To hold them in his eyes.

It must embody what he had always thought must enshrine him at the same time contain the seeds of his liberation in another generation must be as old as the hills as the hills must gleam like headlights here holy law and heresy he started again and they listened.

All possibilities and alternatives exist but ultimately.

Ultimately you want it both ways." (23)

The book ends with a poem and an anti-war message:

"Charteris: He was a self-imagined man
Old when still young
But there’s
Always
Time and everywhere
Recurrently eternally
A hive of selves
He left in the air
Skeleton structures
of thought
and thoughtlessness
To some of us
They are unfinished
Places to some
Slums of nothingness
An ambiguity
Haunted him haunts
Has animal traits
The bombs were only
In his head
On his memorial tree
A joker wrote
KEEP VIOLENCE IN THE MIND
WHERE IT BELONGS."

In the novel, modern civilization and its bombs reduce culture to the stone age. Clearly, however, the acid rock culture offers no better alternative. Men without a god simply create one, even one "barefoot in the head," rather than live for themselves. Even Charteris resorts to this when he makes a god out of the principle of randomness. The novel combines satire, humor, stylistic innovation, and social-philosophical commentary in a convincing whole. Barefoot in the Head an amusing, provocative work, ranks as one of the best experimental science fiction works.

 


F. The Later Aldiss: Nostalgic and Historian


Aldiss did not write science fiction novel for several years after Barefoot in the Head. Indeed, he wrote mainstream novels, criticism, and Billion Year Spree, his critical history of science fiction. His latest works, perhaps inspired by science fiction's history, nostalgically recreate science fiction's past albeit with more wit and more than a little nostalgia. These settings necessarily offer less originality, and Aldiss often feels constrained to elevate the book with either humor or purple passages to make it memorable or at least distinctive. Coming after Billion Year Spree, one can consider them in some ways a continuation of that work, science fiction for its own sake to continue established traditions. Still, unlike some other speculative fiction writers who become popular, Aldiss does not write pot-boilers, and each novel says something original.

Frankenstein Unbound (1973) begins like the Cliffnotes to Mary Shelley's novel, but ends with a different statement. Joe Bodenland, a twentieth century man, passes through a time warp caused by pollution into the 19th century. He meets Mary Shelley hard at work writing her novel; he also, however, encounters an unrepentant Victor Frankenstein. Victor remains proud of his work and even builds his monster a mate. Boden destroys the monster that he considers a symbol for the machine age. The monster presents Boden with mankind's ambiguous relationship with its senses. Dying, the monster achieves real release:

"'This I will tell you, and through you all men, if you are deemed fit to rejoin your kind. That my death will weight more heavily upon you than my life. No fury I might possess could be a match for yours. Moreover, though you seek to bury me, yet will you continuously resurrect me! Once I am bound, I am unbounded." ( 25)

Rational, modern man has attempted to kill his animal self and suffers in consequence. Alternately, don’t kill the beast, the science fiction tradition, that feeds you. Either message, however, seems a bit too heavy for the amusing, escapist quality of the beginning of the book. Aldiss's characterization of real figures Byron, Shelly, and Mary Shelly seem dubious at best. Frankenstein Unbound mixes comedy, fantasy, literary history, social criticism, and sheer fun in an occasionally unsteady mixture.

The Eighty-Minute Hour: A Space Opera (1974) is, sure enough, a space opera, but it satirizes nearly every standard work of standard science fiction from Asimov to Wells. It offers some amusing puns, and if rather outlandish, but it lacks control. The Minute Hour, currently unavailable, justifies a reprint.

In Malaica Tapestry Aldiss does to fantasy what Frankenstein Unbound does to science fiction. In the Byzantine-like city of Malaica, nothing ever changes. This allows free love and much pleasure for the rich, but reduces the poor to interminable servitude and social imprisonment. He repudiates the city and kills a dinosaur, the symbolic and totemic emblem for Malaica. Fantasy, Aldiss suggests, much resembles Malaica, an unchanging dinosaur worshipped by its readers.

 


G. Conclusion


Aldiss remains one of the most formidable figures in speculative fiction. His history, Billion-Year Spree, alone establishes his place as a prominent critic. In his best novels, those written in the mid-1960s and The Long Afternoon of Earth, he uses the traditional hardware of the science fiction novel to write novels of more meaning. In both Report on Probability A and Barefoot in the Head he also creates two of the most completely satisfactory experimental works. If Bradbury and Vonnegut quickly exited to field to become mainstream writers, Aldiss brought mainstream techniques and skills into the medium while keeping at least one foot firmly in the field.


(1) Aldiss quoted in "Brian Aldiss," in More Issues at Hand (Chicago, Advent, 1970), p. 98.
(2) Brian Aldiss in The Dream Makers, p. 272.
(3) James Blish in More Issues at Hand, p. 109.
(4) Aldiss in Platt, p. 274.
(5) Ibid, p. 275.
(6) Aldiss in Platt, p. 279.
(7) Contemporary Literaryu Criticism, Vol. 14, ed. by Dedsick Byfonsky and Laurie Harris (Detroit: Gale Research Company, 1980), pp. 11-14.
(8) Brian Aldiss, Starswarm (New York: Signet, 1964), p. 7.
(9) Brian Aldiss, Galaxies Like Grains of Sand (New York: Signet, 1959), p. 144.
(10) Braian Aldiss, Starship, (New York: Signet, 1960), 0. 6
(11) Peter Ableman, "Gulf Hopping" in The Spectator, Vol 24, 7821, in Contemporary Literary Criticism, Vol. 14, p. 12.
(12) Blish, p. 109.
(13) Ibid.
(14) Brian Aldiss, The Long Afternoon of Earth (New York: Signet, 1962), p. 190.
(15) Ibid.
(16) Aldiss, the Dark-Light Years (New York: Signet, 1964), p. 128.
(17) Neil Barron, Anatomy of Wonder: Science Fiction (New York: Signet, 1964), p. 128.
(18) David Pringle, "Brian Aldiss," in the Science Fiction Encyclopedia (New York: Dolphin Books, 1979), p. 21.
(19) Peter Ableman, "Gulf Hopping," in The Spectator in Contemporary Literary Criticism, Vo. 14 (Detroit: Gale Research, Co, 1980), p. 11.
(20) Aldiss, Cryptozoic! (New York: Avon: 1967), p. 177.
(21) Aldiss, Report on Probability A (New York: Avon, 1980).
(22) Ibid, pp. 143-144.
(23) Aldiss, Barefoot in the Head (New York: Signet), pp. 279-280.
(24) Ibid.
(25) Aldiss, Frankenstein Unbound (London: Pan, 1975), p. 156.


Links to other sites on the Web:
Back to Chapter 7
Forward to Chapter 9